Attention: this is very old content, revived mostly for historical interest.
Many of the pages on this site
are still useful, but please bear in mind that they may be out of date. (Especially, do not try to use contact information, phone numbers, etc.
found on these pages unless you couldn't find anything more recent.)
See here for more information.
![]()
|
|
|
|
MILTON K. WONG: ECONOMIC IMPERATIVES TO SETTLE A NISGA'A TREATYMilton K. Wong, CEO of M.K Wong Associates, urges the B. C. government to settle the Nisga'a Land Question: In the spring of 1997, I submitted this letter to aid the Select Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs with its analysis of the social and economic impacts of the Nisga'a Agreement in Principle and future land claim settlements in British Columbia. "It had come to my attention that one key issue which the Committee has thus far had trouble addressing effectively is that of economic certainty. Economic certainty is crucial to the success of any business endeavor. In the global marketplace, international companies who may wish to invest in B.C. are well aware of, and seriously concerned about, the economic uncertainty that surrounds the province as a result of unresolved land claims. The assumption is that once resolved, following any initial disruption, land claims will pave the way for future investment based on a solid foundation of common understanding. The bottom line is that political instability is always a strike against any area that is hoping to attract investment or generate and support a lively and successful business community. As the CEO of an investment management firm, I can point to examples such as emerging markets mutual funds, which invest primarily in developing countries. Of the 12 Hongkong Bank mutual funds on offer, the Emerging Markets Fund is the smallest: our clients have invested $9.7 million in that fund as of the end of 1996, compared to $493 million in the domestic money market fund. Part of the difference is attributable to the safety of money market funds compared to equities, but the reality is that people do not invest their money if there is a good chance that, due to political instability, they may lose it. Keeping a close eye on political and social conditions is one of the most important jobs for fund managers responsible for such funds. Treaties do bring change, and as a result even the most dynamic members of some societies may be understandably wary of them, fearing substantial shifts in political, social or economic conditions. It is also a commonly expressed worry among British Columbians that any gains achieved by the First Nations through treaties could result in some quantifiable loss to the rest of the population. These and similar natural fears increase the level of uncertainty and to some extent, hostility, surrounding land claims. International corporations do not want to invest in geographic regions that are prone to this kind of instability. A Vancouver accounting firm, KPMG, has completed a Benefits & Costs analysis on the impact of treaty settlements on B.C. Consider their findings:
Others produced similar findings:
Above all else, treaties are about establishing a solid, certain framework for future relations between native and non-native Canadians; and I believe that in the context of such a framework, we can establish a social, political and economic certainty that will encourage investment in British Columbia and therefore be of enormous help to business communities across the province." |
|||
|
|||